<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beach Replenishment Faces Losing Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earthyreport.com/site/beach-replenishment-faces-losing-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earthyreport.com/site/beach-replenishment-faces-losing-battle/</link>
	<description>One by one, we can change the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:47:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnV</title>
		<link>http://www.earthyreport.com/site/beach-replenishment-faces-losing-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earthyreport.com/site/?p=1497#comment-55</guid>
		<description>One of the realities is the cost to compensate owners of not just beach front properties.  How do we handle the expense of compensating whole cities, like Miami or New York?  It most likely is less expensive to save these areas then let them go.  If the oceans rise to 25+ feet then we have no choice but to retreat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the realities is the cost to compensate owners of not just beach front properties.  How do we handle the expense of compensating whole cities, like Miami or New York?  It most likely is less expensive to save these areas then let them go.  If the oceans rise to 25+ feet then we have no choice but to retreat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glennk1949</title>
		<link>http://www.earthyreport.com/site/beach-replenishment-faces-losing-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>glennk1949</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earthyreport.com/site/?p=1497#comment-51</guid>
		<description>You doing a dis-service all of the other folks out here that don&#039;t own beach front homes that don&#039;t happen to think so called beach replenishment is a viable way to protect beaches. Its not. The pt. that the Ocean is rising really means that eventually we&#039;ll have to move back not continue in a utterly futile attempt to use increasingly expensive and scarce beach sand to hold the line. In the long run, some beach front owners are going to have to be bought out and society is going to have to allow the seas to go where they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You doing a dis-service all of the other folks out here that don&#8217;t own beach front homes that don&#8217;t happen to think so called beach replenishment is a viable way to protect beaches. Its not. The pt. that the Ocean is rising really means that eventually we&#8217;ll have to move back not continue in a utterly futile attempt to use increasingly expensive and scarce beach sand to hold the line. In the long run, some beach front owners are going to have to be bought out and society is going to have to allow the seas to go where they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

